Canon B001CBMD6A Reviews, Compare, Prices
 |
Canon B001CBMD6A Reviews, Compare, Prices.
Product: Canon B001CBMD6A Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
Compare Prices on Canon B001CBMD6A
* December 7, 2008 *
When I originally wrote this review abet in August 2008, the ticket of the XSi and the XS kits were the same. Attend then, you would have been foolish to select the XS kit when the XSi offered a lot more at the same designate. During the second-half of 2008, the trace of the XS kit has dropped significantly. Due to the famous label incompatibility between the Canon XSi kit and the Canon XS kit, I have revised this article.
The Canon EOS Rebel XS is the "petite brother" of the Canon EOS Rebel XSi which means they are both almost the same camera, but the XSi has more to offer than the XS. Perhaps deem basing your buying decision on how serious you will be taking up digital SLR photography. If you firmly beget that you will bewitch digital SLR photography very seriously in the long urge and want a solid entry-level digital SLR camera, then the Canon XSi may be a better choice for you. If notice is your main danger and you are only looking for Canon's bottom entry-level digital SLR model, then the recent label of the Canon XS kit is quite salubrious of a recall consideration.
Both models were released in 2008, with the Canon XSi released in April and the Canon XS released four months later in August. By comparison, the XS is a trimmed-down version of the XSi.
Here are the essential similarities of the XSi and the XS:
* Both have practically the same expansive single-plate CMOS sensor and the Digic III Image Processor, except the XSi is 12.2MP while the XS is only 10.1MP (megapixels) .
* Both have the Canon EOS Integrated Cleaning System.
* Both can be purchased with the same EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Kit Lens. It is possible to consume the XSi camera body without the kit lens.
* Both have Live Belief Function with their LCD displays.
* Both are fully compatible with Canon EF and EF-S lenses.
* Both exhaust SD and SDHC memory cards.
* Both expend the same battery pack (LP-E5) and the same optional battery grip (BG-E5) .
* The XS is compatible with most of the Canon EOS camera system accessories that can be faded with the XSi.
Now here are the differences between the XS and the XSi:
* The XSi has more megapixels at 12.2MP while the XS is 10.1MP.
* For JPEG, the XSi can continuously shoot at 3.5 fps while the XS can do 3.0 fps. But for RAW, the XSi is mighty better at 3.5 fps while the XS can only do 1.5 fps.
* The LCD monitor of the XSi measures 3.0 inches while the XS has a smaller cover at 2.5 inches.
* The XSi has a 9-point AF system while the XS has only a 7-point.
* The XSi has Location metering while the XS does not. Both have Evaluative, Partial, and Center-weighted metering, however.
* The XSi RAW is 14-bit while the XS RAW is 12-bit.
* XSi has Highlight Tone Priority while XS does not.
* The viewfinder of the XSi provides 0.87x magnification while the XS provides 0.81x.
* The XSi can expend the RC-1 or the RC-5 wireless remote shutter release, but the XS is not compatible with either so you won't be able to employ a wireless remote release.
* You cannot engage the XS without the kit lens.
My point of this review is to abet consumers weigh their decision between the XSi and the XS from a pricing perspective. As of this writing, I feel that the XSi is currently the best Canon entry-level digital SLR camera for serious beginning enthusiasts. In my conception, the XS is best for those primarily concerned with the impress. If you judge you will not need distinct features that the XSi has but the XS does not, then buying the XS will place you money. Not everyone will expend all of the features on the XSi. However, the XSi may provide serious enthusiasts with more room for growth compared to the XS.
NOTE: Canon USA officially released the EOS Rebel XS in August 2008 and was first announced by Canon USA on July 8, 2008.
"Date first available at Amazon.com: June 17, 2003" is truly an error.
I spent several weeks reviewing the REBEL XS vs it's many 10 MP adversaries, I even checked it against the ultra zooms as I wanted the convenience of video as well, but too many advantageous things stood out with this camera and so I decided upon it. I bought the rebel XS and after days of dirt testing this camera I've found it a magnificent experience.
Now I'm a professional videographer attached to a tv dwelling in Trinidad & Tobago, my purpose for this camera was the need for a hastily provocative calm shot camera that would be impressive under extreme light and composed occupy impressive portrait shots to be old for my website and for sizable prints. I didn't want to shell out over a $1000. US for a camera body.
What is tagged by Canon is true: The pudgy auto mode is truly correct and gives gracious shots always, it makes photography so easy for a beginner or intermediate. The portrait mode isn't blurry, images are spruce, nicely toned, respectable in quality for immense size prints. The P ( program mode) I like alot at first because this mode sets exposure so nicely I found it addictive. I shot alot of night pics of cars on a freeway, with luminous, though-provoking, spirited colours emerging. Night pics at 800 iso had very very very minute noise, and I mean I was searching the pics on 15" monitors for reason to complain, but was really impressed.
The auto focus is really mercurial. Th XS comes with "only" a 7 point auto focus system compared to the XSi 9 point, forgive me when I say there may be no need for another 2 points when the camera focusses so expeditiously and so accurately. I have not gotten a soft image when shot with the auto focus operating.
Now for those point and shoot cams that boast about "face detection"....5 faces...6,7, some even 15. I also have a 10 mp ultra zoom, this simply matters petite if not at all, if the focussing ability of the camera is unpleasant or average, and given the "average lens" quality they're made of.
I have learnt clearly that a 10 MP ultra zoom simply cannot compare to a 10 MP D SLR...chalk and cheese.
I also bought the Tamron 70mm - 300mm, F4-5.6 telephoto/ macro lens. No vignetting at either demolish of the lens.
Auto iso is simply radiant, have not taken a shot where the camera over estimated or underestimated the iso levels.
The Manual mode of this camera is the most impressive for me. The rebel XS via various magazine testing has near up faster than it's other 10 MP rivals when it comes to fps shooting, and burst images. It really does shoot 3 fps consistently, it shoots 2.3 fps in extreme light, worst case is over 1 fps all at 10 MP quality.
I haven't passe a lower quality since, given I bought a Transcend 8GB SDHC card storage is not an enlighten.
Most of my shooting has been at night, for the shrimp done in daylight, it has been unbelievable. Colours are very lustrous, depth of field very very nice. Macros works well. Image optimizer simply jumpy life out of me. I was in a murky state and without flash it really improves the subject without over blowing the background, stuff that is almost impossible on point and shoot cams.
Stuff I disagree with from the "reviews" : 1- "The camera feels cheaply built"....simply rank, nothing is shabby, buttons are actually easy to press, doesn't have cheap clicks to them, the lens mount has a collect feel to it, and a ample snap when it is dwelling. Battery compartment is certainly collect. Your finger must intricately originate the door for entry, won't be an accident articulate. Rubber door at a.v. ports snap in well. Rubber grip is firm enough, mild enough to not irritate your hands.
2- " XS is "overpriced" compared to the XSi.....Xsi shoots slower than the XS, XSi characterize quality is equal to the XS even though the XSi is 12 MP. The XSi may be the 3" LCD and a few other upgrades, but these upgrades don't add up when the describe is taken and the quality of both cameras match alike. I may have chosen the XSI if I wanted to employ the extra $150. u.s but for the lesser trace, I'm yet to regret.
3- "The XS "only has a 2.5" LCD compared to a couple of it's rivals having 3" LCD's". I can contemplate every thing clearly with this conceal, even with Histograms, and grids onscreen. If LCD's find remarkable bigger then canon may need to install a tv tuner as well....the 2.5" is more than sufficient.
4- "The XS doesn't have Residence METERING compared to the XSi, so this is a enormous dispute"- haven't encountered a reason to complain yet, after 500 night shots and 200 day shots.
THE DOWN SIDE: the EOS software for uploading the photos to computer, and remote controlling the cam via computer is Poor. It's a task to upload, as it is beach balling when you hit "upload". Digital professional software is non responsive. I have not been able to consume the software past the install point. Mac version here.
Better exercise i-photo and photoshop.
I highly rate this camera, and as a videographer who's accustomed to t.v. broadcast quality the REBEL XS is worth it, and since canon is so intent on pushing the rebel XSi they have significantly lowered the tag on the XS.....I recommend people occupy the XS and accumulate a pleasant lens with the discount earned. The trick is in the lens and the user, and lesser the camera.
I want to assign you the time and uncertainty in choosing the best affordable DSLR. For those considering the Canon EOS Rebel XS, the Olympus E-510 or the Nikon D40 / D40x / D60, I maintain the Canon XS is the best choice. Also, at the impress dissimilarity between the XS and the SXi ($150-200 as of December '08), the XS is an obliging alternative--both occupy exactly the same high quality pictures, put the 2MP contrast, which is negligible at the ruin. Please impress that the XS's current lens kit comes with the better quality EFS 18-55 Image Stabilization lens (they are better engineered) ; and that Canon is offering nowadays advantageous rebates on telephoto lenses when coupled with the pick of the XS (I bought mine with the entry-level Canon EF 75-300mm III lens with a noble instant Canon rebate. Don't engage from anybody different from B&H Photo, directly from Amazon, Adorama, Buydig/Beach Camera; cease away from Broadway Photo and TriState) .
Canons are celebrated for the well-behaved image processing. Nikons for their Nikor lenses. Olympus, some say, for the color of some of the pictures they win.
The Olympus E-510 has primary flaws, e.g., the average performance in high ISO speeds and highlight blowing. Also, its inconsistency with proper results is worth noting.
The Nikon D40 lacks famous features, e.g., image stabilization in their kit lens. The D60 is lacking the high recount quality ratings of the Canon XS. Both Nikons are nice looking, which is a selling factor I usually consider; but record quality should be your top criterion for the long hurry.
Don't go through the extensive research I have already done (months, and intense debating) . The Canon XS is a winner (specially with the recent IS lens kit), even more with its novel impress (Dec. '08: $480) . It is feature rich (you can even add 3 of your preferred defined Report Style modes), good/professional looking (unlit body), even the sound of the shooter is nicer than the others. Bottom line: Capable describe quality, high ISO/low light noteworthy performance, and relevant features and dwelling for customization obtain the Canon XS a winner for months and even years to arrive.
